Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3FD55115.6070105@bigpond.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:35:33 +0800 From: Dean Scarff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: g++ link errors References: <3FD54C31 DOT 30109 AT bigpond DOT com> <20031209042123 DOT GB14238 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20031209042123.GB14238@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:14:41PM +0800, Dean Scarff wrote: > >>Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote: >> >>>Your compile displays "gcc version 3.2.3" but cygcheck output says you >>>have 3.3.* installed. >>> >>>May I suggest that you try to uninstall+reinstall the gcc packages? >>>Though: I'm not sure this will help you. >> >>Yep, the problem seemed to be that all the 3.2.3 stuff was in >>/usr/local thus overriding the 3.3.1 files which use just the /usr >>prefix. Whether this was a failure of the 3.2.3 uninstall script or >>not I'm not sure, I had to remove all the old files manually (obviously >>uninstalling and reinstalling 3.3.1 wouldn't help, as this wasn't the >>problem). > > > Since there was never a cygwin gcc 3.2.3 release and there has never > been a cygwin release of gcc that installed in /usr/local, it seems like > you installed something that was nonstandard at some point. Yes, I think it was an objective-C package from a while ago I'd forgotten about. Sorry to bother the list with this. -- Dean -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/