Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:41:37 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bug in statfs Message-ID: <20031204094137.GT1640@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:03:41PM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote: > Hi, > POSIX specifies struct statfs to contain slots f_frsize, f_flag, > f_favail, and f_namemax and to be declared in : > > > Cygwin defines struct statfs without slots f_frsize, f_flag, and > f_favail, and with f_namelen instead of f_namemax, in sys/vfs.h (also > included from sys/statfs.h) and does not come with sys/statvfs.h. Sure. It's struct *statfs*, not struct *statvfs*. We also have a statfs system call, not statvfs. So you're talking about adding a new system call. > Any change this might get rectified in the nearest future? Any important information you can't get from statfs? Otherwise it's a matter of time and interest, as usual. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/