Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20031203122259.03524a88@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:23:52 -0500
To: sds AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: bug in statfs
In-Reply-To: <uoeuprfyq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <uoeuprfyq DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 12:03 PM 12/3/2003, Sam Steingold you wrote:
>Hi,
>POSIX specifies struct statfs to contain slots f_frsize, f_flag,
>f_favail, and f_namemax and to be declared in <sys/statvfs.h>:
><http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/statvfs.h.html>
>
>Cygwin defines struct statfs without slots f_frsize, f_flag, and
>f_favail, and with f_namelen instead of f_namemax, in sys/vfs.h (also
>included from sys/statfs.h) and does not come with sys/statvfs.h.
>
>Any change this might get rectified in the nearest future?
>
>Thanks!


I haven't heard of anyone suggesting that they were creating a patch for
this.  Perhaps you want to try?



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/