Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Analyze: Velop Mail Shield v0.0.3 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:48:39 -0200 (BRST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <1 AT pervalidus DOT net> X-X-Sender: fredlwm AT pervalidus DOT dyndns DOT org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Any current plans for an SDL package? In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031123173938.0384b850@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: References: <20031122024809 DOT GA28328 AT redhat DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 22 DOT 0 DOT 20031123173938 DOT 0384b850 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> X-Archive: encrypt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Larry Hall wrote: > At 04:40 PM 11/23/2003, unknown_kev_cat AT hotmail DOT com you wrote: >> I could also try to compile a Cygwin binary version of the >> library, but that would be at least slightly harder. > This would be a true Cygwin package so I don't see a reason > it couldn't be included in setup if it passes successfully > through the ITP stage. Sure, if he wants to become a maintainer. He seemed to wrote the opposite in his first e-mail: "If nobody plans on creating such a package i may be able to, however i warn you now: i do not intend on become a cygwin package maintaner." You don't want another person who submits a package and doesn't maintain it. The Links package is a good example. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/