Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3FBE6D21.1080305@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:53:05 -0500 From: "J. Johnston" Organization: Red Hat Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wayne Hayes Cc: newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [wayne AT cs DOT toronto DOT edu: Cygwin-1.5.5 sscanf on floats: 20 times slower than 2 years ago] References: <03Nov17 DOT 130546edt DOT 453219-16291 AT jane DOT cs DOT toronto DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <03Nov17.130546edt.453219-16291@jane.cs.toronto.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wayne Hayes wrote: >>Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib, >>I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what >>could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20? > > > Thanks! Just to be pedentic, I realized that it's worse than a factor of 20. > My *entire simulation* slows down by a factor of 20; there's significant > other computation in it. So the scanf slowdown is probably closer to > hundreds of times. *Something* fishy must be going on. :-) > The reason for the slow down is long double support. A new routine _strtold is used instead of _strtod_r. I am working on a patch to use the old routine for non-long-doubles to avoid the slow down. -- Jeff J. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/