Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:09:43 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: ftello loosing upper 32 bits via _lseek64 Message-ID: <20031118150943.GT18706@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20031117221509 DOT GP18706 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3FB97CD2 DOT 8060101 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:59:57AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: > I know this doesn't belong on cygwin-patches anymore, but is > cygwin-developers, or just plain cygwin more appropriate? This is a newlib problem with a newlib patch. I don't see a reason to bother a Cygwin list with it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/