Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: eos.vss.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:21:43 -0600 (CST) From: Brian Ford X-X-Sender: ford AT eos To: Brian P Kasper cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote: > Thanks, Brian. Your suggestion to look for gcc-g++ pointed me at the answer. > > I didn't realize that the backends for GCC don't show up in the > "partial" view of Cygwin Setup, only the "Not Installed" view. > Well, the "partial" view tells you what would be updated/installed based on your selections. The "default" selection means to only update what you already have. Since you didn't already have gcc-g++, it obviously wouldn't show up there. However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International Phone: 314-551-8460 Fax: 314-551-8444 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/