Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: cygwin too slow Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:21:45 -0800 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: koorapati, koundinya wrote: > In strace I'm not able to see > which system call is eating up so much time as when I start a program say > 'ls' with strace, I see nothing and only as ls begins to run after getting > loaded, strace throws it's output. He's sort of right in that often, there's a mysterious wait of a second or two, even on a completely unloaded system, before the process starts running. I suspect it has something to do with our flaky network (we're in a workgroup without a primary WINS server or a domain controller). Even if there are no network drives in the path, I suspect that things like looking up the local host name will also be slow if there are subtle network problems like this, and can cause this delay on startup.. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/