Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3FAD6706.58495361@dessent.net> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 13:58:30 -0800 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... X-Accept-Language: en,en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Info versus Man References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.linuxsv3.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cygwin.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dessent.net Note-from-DJ: This may be spam zzapper wrote: > > Hi Ya All > > Is INFO just a viewer for Man Pages, or does it have it's own > database? > > Is INFO preferred to MAN ?? > > (Sorry for hogging this NG recently) > zzapper Yes, they are completely seperate. The 'info' program reads and displays texinfo documents, which live in /usr/info. texinfo documents are organized into nodes, which leads to a sort of link structure or heirarchy. The 'info' program is just one way of formatting/viewing them, they can also be easily formatted as PostScript, HTML, etc. The 'man' program formats and displays manpages which are a much older format (nroff/groff). They contain markup to make sections stand out, highlight commands vs. normal text, etc. but they are still essentially flat text files with embellishment. They live in /usr/man. The GNU people decided one day that man pages had worn out their welcome and so they developed the texinfo project to support a new format of documentation. Thus, the preferred docu for all the GNU utils are the texinfo files, and the manpages are really an afterthought in a lot of cases. However many people hate the 'info' program and just want plain old manpages, so I wouldn't expect them to go away any time soon. Personally I have mixed feelings about both. If you ever try to use the manpage for 'bash' you quickly realize how cumbersome it is, compared to viewing the HTML version of the texinfo docs online. However, for quick and dirty things that basically consist of a short summary of some options the manpage cannot be beat. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/