Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin patches integrating back into standard gnu
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cwilson <cwilson AT fastmail DOT fm>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3FAC62E6.8050404@fastmail.fm>
References: <3FAABE0A DOT 6090406 AT ekers DOT idps DOT co DOT uk>
	 <1068154769 DOT 3faabf91a071f AT www DOT nexusmail DOT uwaterloo DOT ca>
	 <20031106222357 DOT GA25195 AT redhat DOT com>
	 <20031107023331 DOT GA16244 AT mdssdev05 DOT comp DOT pge DOT com>
	 <3FAB099D DOT 9090705 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
	 <20031107191452 DOT GB16244 AT mdssdev05 DOT comp DOT pge DOT com>
	 <3FAC62E6 DOT 8050404 AT fastmail DOT fm>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/5Vcb+mseAPsvnjZDNV0"
Message-Id: <1068267566.1188.43.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 15:59:26 +1100

--=-/5Vcb+mseAPsvnjZDNV0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 14:28, cwilson wrote:

> > It'd probably be wise to integrate this with setup.exe so you would=20
> > have the option to install packages in a non-standard place.=20
>=20
> Oh god no.  "Click here to automatically fsck-up all the binaries I just=20
> installed"  THAT's a GREAT idea!  I nominate you to support that nightmar=
e.

No need for anyone to support it -  it ain't going in setup, no how, no
way. Someone wants a non-standard location, they roll their own binary.
Finito.=20

> But they didn't really pursue this too strongly -- instead, they focused=20
> on attempting to make the transition smooth ('autoupdate', etc).  They=20
> ignored the network-stasis effects (essentially, a classic 'deadlock'=20
> problem: you first, no you first...)

Yes, and IMO a nutso one. Coexistence is more important than smooth
transition in the absence of a dictator forcing concurrent upgrades.

Rob

--=20
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

--=-/5Vcb+mseAPsvnjZDNV0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/rHgtI5+kQ8LJcoIRAtAqAJwKYXBmcgRpamqtNwpSOGLOGlo0FgCfX2TL
EpXjFrr6DbVu2ulWZot/7rs=
=Sooh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-/5Vcb+mseAPsvnjZDNV0--