Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:58:45 +0100
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <4623962140.20031104165845@familiehaase.de>
To: Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
CC: CygWin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
In-Reply-To: <3FA7C328.7070801@lapo.it>
References: <bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
 <157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bo67ls$gv8$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
 <15820826718 DOT 20031104160630 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3FA7C328 DOT 7070801 AT lapo DOT it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Hello Lapo,

Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 4:18:00 PM, you wrote:

> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
>>compared with the STLport library.  So it would make sense to use it when
>>performance is an issue.
>>  
>>
> I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared.
> (or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) )

Unfortunately the shared STLport library doesn't work, at least in this
case.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerrit 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/