Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3FA7C328.7070801@lapo.it>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:18:00 +0100
From: Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mailing List: CygWin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
References: <bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bo67ls$gv8$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <15820826718 DOT 20031104160630 AT familiehaase DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <15820826718.20031104160630@familiehaase.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
>compared with the STLport library.  So it would make sense to use it when
>performance is an issue.
>  
>
I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared.
(or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) )

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/