Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: cygwin deadlocks due to lack of money Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:13:17 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2003 18:13:17.0946 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8C1B5A0:01C39FDA] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h9VIDV9U007526 Okay, I spent some time looking at the mailing list archives but found nothing which added anything to this discussion. I would have hoped that my intended offer of use of an Athlon 64 system would have counted as more than just 'idle curiosity' and, anyway, I'm never 'idle'. Quite honestly, I wondered what 64-bit op system you were hoping to test on. As I said: it all seems to be okay running Win-32 on an AMD-64, and I've not seen 64-bit Windoze around yet. I would be surprised if you were planning on a Linux version of cygwin for obvious reasons, and AFAIK BeOS, PetrOS, Lindows, Plan9, etc, etc, haven't got 64-bit versions out yet. Anyway, you've made your point: why should you spend a minute or so telling me something you already know when, with one simple put-down, you can suggest I go search through archives for an hour ? Fine ! Nice attitude, mate ! BTW My plan was to either test for you (under direction) or make the machine available to you via some sort of terminal server and my ADSL connection. I didn't fancy having it transported. I did actually want to contribute something to the cygwin project, as I've found it so valuable over the past couple of years. Shame you weren't interested. Bye. -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com] Sent: 31 October 2003 17:00 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin deadlocks due to lack of money On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:30:00PM -0000, kevin DOT lawton AT bt DOT com wrote: >You expect cygwin NOT to run on an Athlon 64 system ? How so ? Under >what operating system ? Under 32-bit Windoze, nothing seems any >different - you're not planning a Linux version of cygwin, are you ? Hmm. It seems like a search of the mailing list archives would be a pretty simple way of satisfying this kind of idle curiousity. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/