Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:22:36 +0100
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <43-1680745334.20031031172236@familiehaase.de>
To: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
In-Reply-To: <bntl4h$jci$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <bnr72n$li9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
 <157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de> <bntl4h$jci$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Alex wrote:


> "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de> wrote in message
> news:157-1772867639 DOT 20031030154714 AT familiehaase DOT de...
>> Alex wrote:
>>
>> > An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers
>> >
>> >
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de
>> >   was used as a performance testsuite
>> >   to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers.
>>
>> >
>> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> > |               Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3
>> >
>> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> > | Version 8.35n        | -   | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 |  3.82 :  3.74 |
>> >
>> |========================================================================|
>>
>>
>> Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would
>> increase perfomance?
>>
> [snip]

> What is the way to test that?
> In other words, is there STLporting with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler?

I posted a Makefile to build a Cygwin version of STLport with DLL's and
static archives:  http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg00790.html

If it shows up that using STLport instead of libstdc++ templates
increases the speed of the code running, maybe someone volunteers to
maintain an STLport package for Cygwin?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=                                     http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/