Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:47:14 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <157-1772867639.20031030154714@familiehaase.de> To: "Alex Vinokur" CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Alex wrote: > An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers > > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de > was used as a performance testsuite > to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers. > |------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3 > |------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | Version 8.35n | - | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 | 3.82 : 3.74 | > |========================================================================| Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would increase perfomance? Gerrit -- =^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/