Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:32:42 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Pb with INT64_MAX in /usr/include/stdint.h (+patch) Message-ID: <20031028163242.GD29657@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3418F3471F1CA4409901547349FFAE2E0BBF01 AT ftrdmel2 DOT rd DOT francetelecom DOT fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3418F3471F1CA4409901547349FFAE2E0BBF01@ftrdmel2.rd.francetelecom.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:08:37PM +0100, zze-BDE balg011 VAUCHER Laurent DvSI/SIReS/GRE wrote: >gcc refuses to compile a file containing the line : > > int64_t Val = INT64_MAX; > > complaining that the literal integer value is too big. >It seems that replacing in stdint.h the line > #define INT64_MAX (9223372036854775807) >by > #define INT64_MAX (9223372036854775807LL) > > solves the problem. There are some other #define that >should be patched this way, I think. I've checked a fix into CVS. Thanks for pinpointing the exact place that needs to be changed. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/