Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031028085930.02ad1350@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:07:31 -0500
To: Alexander Schremmer <usenet2003c AT alexanderweb DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.5.5-1: fprintf(stdout, ...) writes to serial port when
  used by apcupsd
In-Reply-To: <1wv9nod7vs41n.dlg@alexanderweb.de>
References: <12107mcqwov6m$.dlg AT alexanderweb DOT de>
 <20031028031312 DOT GA9238 AT redhat DOT com>
 <1x0r6sdq5vkem DOT dlg AT alexanderweb DOT de>
 <20031028110324 DOT GZ1653 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <1wv9nod7vs41n DOT dlg AT alexanderweb DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 07:57 AM 10/28/2003, Alexander Schremmer you wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:03:24 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:41:02AM +0100, Alexander Schremmer wrote:
>>> 
>>> /---- [JFYI - Sending mail to cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com:] -------------------\
>>> | <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>:                                               |
>>> | Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)                       |
>>> \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
>> 
>> This is intended.  Please keep replies on list.  Don't send private email.
>
>but why does Christopher Faylor send his reply to my address as well? 


So that you get his response.  People sending email to this list don't
*have* to be subscribed, though it's encouraged.  If you prefer to have
replies go to the list and not to you, set the "Reply-To" field to the 
cygwin list.  That'll handle it.


>And
>why doesn't he use something like *@*.invalid but breaks RFC by supplying
>an syntactically correct but not connected address?


Chris set the "Reply-To" field.  This is appropriate to allow clients to 
infer the poster's intent and route any replies appropriately.  I don't
know how gmane works in this regard however.  You may need to talk with
gmane folks to figure this out.


>How about creating an auto-responder noreply AT cygwin DOT com? This situation is
>rather confusing.


Sorry, it's not intended to be.  However, now that I pointed out the 
"Reply-To" field, I expect that helps.  No?  If not, don't reply to me.
You'll be confused again. ;-)



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/