Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: RE: undefined reference to `_getline'
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:05:02 -0400
Message-ID: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1DE4DF11@exchange.timesys.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robb, Sam" <sam DOT robb AT timesys DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h9O56SFM006932

> I suppose that in all of your searching you never came across the
> concept that cygwin uses newlib and that cygwin does not export every
> single thing from newlib?  That means that there are some 
> things defined in headers which are not actually available in cygwin.

No, I understand that - I was wondering if the missing
export is becuase of a lack of interest, or if there is
some problem with the newlib version of getline() that
keeps it from being exported.

> If you find that unconvincing, then yes.  We'e just doing this because
> we don't like you and we're very mean.

Wow.  cgf just told me "we're mean".

It gives me the same weird feeling of _belonging_ 
I had when I got my very first Nigerian 911 spam.

;-)

-Samrobb

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/