Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3F96EB86.5641E01D@phumblet.no-ip.org> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:41:42 -0400 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" Reply-To: Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin performance References: <3F95B7DE DOT 90601 AT tlinx DOT org> <20031022200202 DOT GA25720 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:40:10PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote: > >> From: Linda W. > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 12:49 AM > > > >> >>Perhaps it is unavoidable, but I see things like find doing 2 > >> >>'opens' /file when it is searching for files...can't it just do a > >> >>'stat' of some nature? does it need to do an open, let alone 2? The reason why stat() opens a file even with ntsec is to use GetFileInformationByHandle > > I believe that the major culprit is looking for executable files. If I have > >understood things correctly. > > > >$ mount -h | grep exe > > -x, --executable treat all files under mount point as executables > > -E, --no-executable treat all files under mount point as > > non-executables > > -X, --cygwin-executable treat all files under mount point as > > cygwin executables AFAIK this applies only when (smb)ntsec isn't in effect. Correct me if I am wrong. > >I've not tried this, but anyway: I wonder what happens if one uses the > >sequence; > > > > umount /blaha > > mount -E / -X / -x "MS-PATH" /blaha > > find /blaha ... > > umount /blaha > > mount -bs "MS-PATH" /blaha > > The syntax would be: > > mount -f -E x:/foo /foo > > foo can be a directory or a file, as always. This will force cygwin to > believe that the file is not executable. > > Although, hmm. I just tried this and bash still executed a file that should > be non-executable. I'll have to see why. bash walks down the PATH looking for anything that matches the name. It remembers the first match but keeps walking until it finds an executable. If no executable is found, it returns the first match, if any. If it's a directory, too bad (a non-executable file can be masked by a directory). Pierre -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/