Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:14:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: pwd option to return windows path Message-ID: <20031022031433.GA12322@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20031022003445 DOT GC1229 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <20031022012824 DOT GF1229 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <20031022015145 DOT GJ380 AT redhat DOT com> <20031022020853 DOT GA1923 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031022020853.GA1923@mdssirds.comp.pge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:08:53PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: >Personally, I think that gunter had the best option - if you don't like >what I say, just - personally - direct me to /dev/null. Problem >solved. If people think that I'm not 'on topic' I'll get ignored. Sorry. You don't get special treatment. >And my guess is that you sure as hell aren't going to accept any >patches that do what you - as I can see - find exceedingly distasteful, >so what's the point in having the up-front aggravation? Your guess, like many of your perceptions about cygwin and mingw is flawed. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/