Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:58:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: David Balazic cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: setup.exe what versions ? In-Reply-To: <600B91D5E4B8D211A58C00902724252C01BC0392@piramida.hermes.si> Message-ID: References: <600B91D5E4B8D211A58C00902724252C01BC0392 AT piramida DOT hermes DOT si> Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Setup already supports versioned dependences. However, it was decided not to use those, as it'll only add to the confusion. Simply upgrade to the latest Cygwin, and things should work. If they don't, report a bug, and it will be fixed eventually. The message you quoted below was referring to the fact that when you manually cycle through versions in the chooser, you will go through the Test versions of packages as well. If you simply select "Curr" and don't change package versions except to "Keep/Skip", you should not get Test versions of anything. In general, it's best to go with the version suggested by setup in a given mode and to not select a particular version manually unless you know exactly what you're doing. Igor On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, David Balazic wrote: > What happened to that automatic dependency checking, > that was talked about a few months ago ? > > And what about "test versions should not appear for selection if Exp is not > choosen" ? > I quote Larry Hall : > > Setup offers test versions to you even when > you don't specify "Exp". But it's always done this. It's just more > noticeable now. It will go away in a few weeks when 1.5.x becomes "Curr". > > > > From: Igor Pechtchanski > > Sent: 20. oktober 2003 16:38 > > > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, David Balazic wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > I already have cygwin installed and want to install gcc ( I do not have > > > it currently installed ). > > > > > > I run setup.exe, and have two options for gcc , versions 3.3.1-2 and 3.2-3. > > > > > > Now I had some problems last time with some experimental package > > > versions that are not compatible to the rest and therefore do not work > > > at all. > > > > > > So my question is, which gcc version is non-experimental ? > > > The older version ? > > > I there some simple rule ? > > > > > > Thanks in advance ! > > > David > > > > The simplest thing you can do is look at the announcements for each > > version and see whether they mention anything special (like requiring > > Cygwin 1.5.*). The announcements are in the cygwin-announce archives (at, > > for example, ). HTH, > > Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/