Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject: Re: ash does not understand '~'
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:04:05 -0700
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <bmpor6$l9m$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <bmpf7i$el2$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCEKEHKDFAA DOT garbage_collector AT telia DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCEKEHKDFAA.garbage_collector@telia.com>

Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:

>>I'm not that concerned about Amiga OS.
>>    
>>
> I'm not surprised.
>
>Did you even read what I've left unsnipped above, 
>
I glanced at it. Even went on line and googled around for Amiga OS a 
little. Too much info too little time. As I said I'm not that concerned 
about Amiga OS that much. Ancient OSes are of little interest to me 
except as historical reading...

>which was my main point. The Amiga references was given as an _example_ of an OS where bash et al are _HARD_ to port, others may well exists, this was the one *I* knew about.
>  
>
>>Honestly I don't know much about it. Is it even Unix like?
>>    
>>
>More so than D.O.S. (i.e. cmd/command) is. 
>
Who ever said that DOS was "unix like"!?! Hell we aren't discussing 
whether or not "~" is understood by DOS (cmd/command)!?!

>Given the contents of geekgadgets the "unix-likeness" is or could be at the same level as cygwin
>provides - in some areas better, others lesser. 
>
Then it should therefore sport a modern shell that at least understands 
"~", no?

>('could be' as the development has "stopped")
>
Sorta like Latin, eh?

>Well - whatever, this os OT. :-] lets stop it.
>
But it's fun! :-)

I know, I know, old habits die hard and that is essentially my point. I 
remember one time complaining about HP-UX not recognizing the backspace 
key when logging into a tty. Old timers there quickly told me that del = 
backspace which, to me at the time, was totally weird. Why put a key on 
a keyboard labelled backspace which does not do backspace?!? Why have 
del do a backspace instead?

One old timer piped up "Well in the old days sonny! [embellishing here a 
little bit] we only had teletypes and if you looked at a the keys there 
the DEL key was a lot easier to hit than the backspace key" to which I 
gave a puzzled grin and replied "Who's using teletypes anymore?".

Another old timer remarked that the user could actually want a backspace 
in their password to which I could think of two responses: 1) "What if 
they wanted DEL?" and 2) "If they are wierd enough to want a backspace 
in their password then they should have to escape it!".

OK, I had my quota of fun for this Friday. See y'all next week! :-)
-- 
I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/