Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20031013190807.02f0dd10@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:11:05 -0400 To: Edward Peschko , "Gerrit @ cygwin" From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: results of compiling berkeleydb In-Reply-To: <20031013211317.GB25036@mdssirds.comp.pge.com> References: <7714914886 DOT 20031013231525 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20031013010344 DOT GA18830 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <20031013045649 DOT GA15683 AT redhat DOT com> <20031013055941 DOT GA20245 AT mdssirds DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <7714914886 DOT 20031013231525 AT familiehaase DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 05:13 PM 10/13/2003, Edward Peschko you wrote: >On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:15:25PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> Hallo Edward, >> >> >> GCC='gcc -mno-cygwin' ./configure. >> >> [...] >> >> > (ex: -mno-cygwin doesn't define WINNT, which mingw does) >> >> $ gcc -mno-cygwin -dM -E -xc /dev/null | grep WINNT >> #define WINNT 1 > >my mistake. but still, problems exist (as per my previous statement, try the two >gcc commands one against mingw, the other against cygwin, and compare the two >results. They are vastly out of sync. Thanks for the report. I think it's fair to say that this is a dead thread unless it inspires someone else to make the changes you want (or you consider submitting a patch for review that achieves your goals). -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/