Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
Subject: Re: Is a function actually inlined?
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:33:20 +0200
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <bm1e98$eib$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <bm0ks2$j8i$2 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20031008100004 DOT GC2070 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


"Corinna Vinschen" <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote in message news:20031008100004 DOT GC2070 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de...
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote:
> > How can one know if a function requested to be inlined is actually inlined?
>
> A look into the assembler output generated by gcc/g++ will show you.
>

How can one conclude if a function is actually inlined on the basis working with  the nm and objdump utilities?
For instance, are 'the foo2() and foo3() function from my original posting' actually inlined?

   =====================================
   Alex Vinokur
     mailto:alexvn AT connect DOT to
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
   =====================================







--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/