Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:49:14 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-1.5.4-1 breaks fetchmail on Win9x Message-ID: <20031007134914.GA19358@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3F7F77B0 DOT 853C8E40 AT alphalink DOT com DOT au> <20031007021300 DOT GA1596 AT tishler DOT net> <20031007025837 DOT GD10639 AT redhat DOT com> <20031007131904 DOT GA2128 AT tishler DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031007131904.GA2128@tishler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:19:05AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >Chris, > >On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:58:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:13:00PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >> >BTW, there seemed to be some gyration regarding this section of >> >unlink() during that time period: >> >> ...which might be illuminated by reading the archives, I suspect... > >I tried searching the archives via Google and Cygwin's mailing list >search engine, but came up empty. Would you be willing to enlighten >me? Actually, I am trying not to have to do the search myself. I recall that there was a discussion about this with Pierre which caused the change to take place. It might have been in the cygwin-developers list. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/