Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 03:06:50 +1000 From: Anand Kumria To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: Cygwin Setup application dialog size Message-ID: <20031005170649.GB18295@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20031005124448 DOT 01f213d8 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20031005124448.01f213d8@127.0.0.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:50:59PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: > At 12:15 PM 10/5/2003, Anand Kumria you wrote: > >[This is an email copy of a Usenet post to "gmane.os.cygwin"] > > > >On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 01:09:54 +1000, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Mikko Ohtamaa wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Could Cygwin Setup window size enlarged? It's paint to scroll up'n'down > >>> and left right with that tiny dialog when selecting individual > >>> packages. It's not possible to resize the window manually. > >>> > >>> -Mikko Ohtamaa > >>> (not a subscriber) > >> > >> might be of > >> interest. > > > >Well how about increasing the default size of the window then? > > > >I assume the size is specified, and enforced, somewhere? > > > If you're really interested in this subject, I suggest a thorough perusal > of the cygwin-apps and cygwin mail archives (the former has the most > pertinent content). All this has been discussed, in detail, there. If > there was a simple solution for this, it would be implemented already. > However, if you feel differently, feel free to make a change and submit > the patch for review. Well I just spent a few minutes searching for the code. I couldn't see it in CVS, (), feel free to send me a pointer and I might take a look. > > The current size is the largest possible for low resolution screens. 800x600 is what most people, including Microsoft, regard as low resoultion nowadays. Are there such a substanial number of people running at 640x480 that we ought to cater to them by default? Anand -- `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/