Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:04:39 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] notice of package removal: gcc2-2.95-* Message-ID: <20031005170439.GB10102@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20031005051332 DOT 4028232A8A7 AT redhat DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20031005125150 DOT 0286aeb8 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20031005125150.0286aeb8@127.0.0.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: >At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote: > > >>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be >>available. > >Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-) I don't think it's even an issue. B20 compiles files for you automatically and corrects errors on the fly. So, even if things didn't work initially, B20, would eventually figure out what was wrong and correct the problem. cB20f -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/