Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3F7F8BE8.7070006@urth.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 20:11:36 -0700
From: Terrence Brannon <metaperl AT urth DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: emacs -nw control-c mapped to control-g
References: <m2ad8nwj4u DOT fsf AT beth DOT swift DOT xxx> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20030929173044 DOT 028c4240 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030929173044.028c4240@127.0.0.1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

When I open emacs via "emacs -nw" in a cygwin bash shell, it maps 
control-c to control-g for some reason...

I looked through the archive and this fine gentlemen's post:

   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg01647.html

appears to have been ignored.

Am I doomed to the same fate? Does the entire Cygwin team use vi???  :-)







--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/