Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 13:50:52 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: missing java headers
Message-ID: <20031004175052.GE31073@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030921000411 DOT 86E4632A822 AT redhat DOT com> <3F7E2B7A DOT 2030804 AT kleckner DOT net> <10-1465508400 DOT 20031004190846 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10-1465508400.20031004190846@familiehaase.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:08:46PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hallo Jim,
  e

>you wrote:
>
>> I tried uncompressing, configuring, and "make" of gcc.
>> Recompiling and installing 3.3.1-1 fails to install the headers.
>> Subsequent uncompress, configure, recompile of 3.2-3 failed
>> to compiler.
>
>> Checking the gcc java list
>>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/
>> doesn't reveal (to me) the answer.
>
>> Gerrit, do you know since you have the most relevant
>> posts on the gcc/java list?
>
>gcc-3.3.1 builds/runs fine for me, I will hopefully get my server up
>and running the next week, then I can offer a complete package,
>including all 'default' frontends plus Pascal.  If you want to compile
>yourself I can send you the latest patch against the gcc-3.3.1
>original source I used and the scripts I use to build, though the Ada
>frontend will not build if you have not already Ada installed. Just
>drop a short note.

I've repeatedly asked for someone to take over maintainership of gcc.
If you are producing packages on your web site can I ask you go to all
of the way and maintain gcc for cygwin?

If you are not willing to do this, then please don't advertise your
package here.  The last thing I need is someone adding confusion to this
situation.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/