Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 10:16:19 +1000 From: Nigel Stewart and Fiona Smith Subject: Re: Future of OpenGL package (Earnie, please read this) In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030926161937.02cb5af8@irispavp.igb.umontreal.ca> To: Andre Bleau , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <3F7CBFD3.3080702@nigels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030827 References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030926161937 DOT 02cb5af8 AT irispavp DOT igb DOT umontreal DOT ca> > I think we waited long enough for freeglut and some update of GLUT and > GLUI is overdue. FreeGLUT has certainly gained momentum in recent months, but I sould say that GLUT will still be needed for a while. I recently suggested to the FreeGLUT list that GL/freeglut.h should be used, rather than colliding with GL/glut.h --- as a "migration path" so that GLUT and FreeGLUT could be packaged side by side without conflicts or confusion. If you have an opinion on that I suggest you chime ni. Just to let you know, I am acting as caretaker for GLUI at the moment: http://www.nigels.com/glt/glui/ I am thinking of doing a 2.3 release later this year, nothing major, mainly fixing minor irritations. If there are any GLUI forks out there, it would be nice to merge them back... (I also have a bunch of contributed patches which I'll need to evaluate for inclusion) Nigel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/