Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Strange make [Error 255] (cygwin bug?) References: <20030925134745 DOT GC14708 AT redhat DOT com> <003601c3837c$1a217710$8006fea9 AT bertigep> <20030926084824 DOT GE22787 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20030926152705 DOT GC12094 AT redhat DOT com> <20030926175750 DOT GR22787 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Organization: Jan at Appel Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:01:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030926175750.GR22787@cygbert.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:57:50 +0200") Message-ID: <87n0cql48x.fsf@peder.flower> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Corinna Vinschen writes: >> How does it make it unnecessary? Won't it still cause make to return >> an error as opposed to actually getting make working? > > Yes, but it returns a correct, useful error message. Obviously there > is a system imposed upper limit of command line length on all systems, > even if it's 256MB or whatever. So relying on these overlong command > lines is highly non-portable anyway and at least Cygwin now returns > the correct message if it comes to that. Hmm, maybe you're right and we should fix the installation process, but this is the first problem we heard of. If it's really that highly non-portable, then Cygwin is the least obscure UNIX system that doesn't grok this :-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/