Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:27:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Strange make [Error 255] (cygwin bug?) Message-ID: <20030926152705.GC12094@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030925134745 DOT GC14708 AT redhat DOT com> <003601c3837c$1a217710$8006fea9 AT bertigep> <20030926084824 DOT GE22787 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030926084824.GE22787@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:48:24AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:45:33PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor wrote: >> > In any event, this might help: >> > mount -f -X c:/cygwin/bin /bin >> >> This has solved the problem, thank you very much. > >The next Cygwin developers snapshot contains a patch which should make >this workaround unnecessary. How does it make it unnecessary? Won't it still cause make to return an error as opposed to actually getting make working? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/