Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:21:29 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Poor network performance with cygwin utilities
Message-ID: <20030925072129.GQ9981@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200309242219 DOT h8OMJ0120458 AT mx1 DOT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200309242219.h8OMJ0120458@mx1.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:19:00PM -0400, jason AT ancept DOT com wrote:
> $ scp build/ams.war jason AT deathstar:
> ams.war 100% 22MB 155.2KB/s 02:21
> Neither machine showed significant CPU load during either test. (both machines <
> 10%)
> 
> Has anyone seen similar problems?

scp somefile linuxbox:
somefile 100% 30MB 4.8MB/s 00:05

Hmm, apparently not.  You could strace the application to see what
takes the time.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/