Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:45:07 +0200
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <15334716930.20030923214507@familiehaase.de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: FYI: bladeenc - fairly easy port.
In-Reply-To: <NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCECEHIDEAA.garbage_collector@telia.com>
References: <NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCECEHIDEAA DOT garbage_collector AT telia DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Hannu schrieb:

> Approximate speed difference:
>  -O2 runs 1.75x speed
>  -O0 runs 0.75x speed (P2/450!)
>  -O0: "All operations completed. Total encoding time: 00:47:46"
>  -O2: "All operations completed. Total encoding time: 00:20:04"

I guess it will be faster when using a native Windows (non Cygwin based)
version.  Is there also a Windows port available?  How fast is it
compared with the Cygwin version?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/