Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Analyze: Velop Mail Shield v0.0.3
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:38:52 -0300 (E. South America Standard Time)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <0 AT pervalidus DOT tk>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: checking for shmat in -lipc... no
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0309211431520.160@pervalidus>
X-X-Sender: fredlwm AT imap DOT fastmail DOT fm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

While running configure for IceWM (I don't think it's a
question for cygwin-xfree) I noticed the following:

checking for shmat... no
checking for shmat in -lipc... no

The second test returned yes when I created libipc.a and
libipc.dll.a symlinks.

What's the right procedure for this test, which should be
present in other packages ? Ignore ? Create symlinks ? Change
configure.in ?

-- 
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/