Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030920021448.00b919a0@pop01.datazug.ch> X-Sender: (Unverified) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 02:28:57 +0200 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Jean-Pierre Praz Subject: /bin/kill version 1.14 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed hello after an update of a few cygwin components, i have now the problem that some scripts that use 'kill -9' or 'kill -INT' don't work any more. they produce the following output: Usage: kill [-f] [-signal] [-s signal] pid1 [pid2 ...] kill -l [signal] Send signals to processes -f, --force force, using win32 interface if necessary -l, --list print a list of signal names -s, --signal send signal (use kill --list for a list) -h, --help output usage information and exit -v, --version output version information and exit the same output appears when i execute a '/bin/kill' command. but when i execute simply 'kill' (without the leading /bin/) the result is different and looks like this: kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] [pid | job]... or kill -l [sigspec] if i change the appropriate line in a script to 'kill -s 9' instead of 'kill -9' it works. but i can't change all the scripts. what could be the reason for this behaviour after the few updates i did? why does 'kill' not produces the same output as '/bin/kill'? i wondered if there were two versions of kill in different paths, but i only found one of them.... thank for ideas and help jpp -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/