Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:15:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Alex Vinokur cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygkpathsea-3-3-7.dll (was Re: grep.exe - Unable to locate DLL) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87n0d5wwre DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > "Alex Vinokur" wrote in message news:bk60un$p98$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org... > > > > "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote in message news:87n0d5wwre DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower... > > > Alex Vinokur writes: > > > > > > > $ cygcheck -c | grep tetex > > > > tetex 20020911-1 OK > > > > tetex-bin 20020911-1 OK > > > > > > ... but you must have libkpathsea3*-2.0.x or something. Very strange. > > > > > > The picture of your setup.exe suggests that the mirror that you use is > > > very much out of date. What mirror do you use? > > > > http://ftp.inf-tu.dresden.de (See attachment). > > > [snip] > > It seems that http://ftp.inf-tu.dresden.de is OK. > Perhaps it was my fault. Sorry. > > Now the problem with kpsewhich.exe (cygkpathsea-3-3-7) is solved. > > ------ BEGIN ------ > 1. I anew installed tetex, tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-devel which were > downloaded from http://ftp.inf-tu.dresden.de . > > 2. > $ cygcheck -c | grep tetex > tetex 2.0.2-12 OK > tetex-base 2.0.2-12 Incomplete > tetex-beta 20020911-1 OK > tetex-bin 2.0.2-12 OK > tetex-devel 2.0.2-12 OK > tetex-doc 20020911-1 OK > tetex-extra 20020911-1 OK > tetex-tiny 20020911-1 Incomplete > tetex-x11 20020911-1 OK > > $ cygcheck -cd | grep tetex > tetex 2.0.2-12 > tetex-base 2.0.2-12 > tetex-beta 20020911-1 > tetex-bin 2.0.2-12 > tetex-devel 2.0.2-12 > tetex-doc 20020911-1 > tetex-extra 20020911-1 > tetex-tiny 20020911-1 > tetex-x11 20020911-1 > [snip] Three quick notes: 1) There is no reason to run *both* "cygcheck -c" and "cygcheck -cd" -- the package version information will be absolutely the same. The only difference is the integrity checking in "cygcheck -c". 2) Is there a particular reason why you didn't upgrade *all* of your tetex packages to the latest version? 3) I'd investigate the "Incomplete"s above -- "tetex-*" aren't supposed to have missing files. The next step after seeing an "Incomplete" package is to run "cygcheck -cv" to see which files are considered missing (as suggested in ). If "cygcheck -c" erroneously reports some files as missing, I'd like to know about it. Hope this helps, Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/