Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)" To: Subject: RE: Find: missing alphabetically last dirtree - FIX verified Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:42:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030914021358.GA12927@redhat.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal > From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf > Of Christopher Faylor Unrelated comments added after /-line below. > This still bugged me and I finally managed to duplicate it > on one of my non-CD directories. The problem only manifests if the first > entry in a directory is a directory. It's an ancient cygwin problem that > should be fixed in "tonight's snapshot". "I do hereby verify" that the latest snapshot, i.e: $ cygcheck -svr | grep -i cygwin1 ... 948k 2003/09/14 C:\Program\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll - os=4.0 img=1.0 sys=4.0 "cygwin1.dll" v0.0 ts=2003/9/14 4:09 indeed makes find behave as it should. My tests aren't that deep one could expect though; I've run my 'find_check'-script on the three MSDN CD's so far. I'll probably be using other related scripting henceforth RSN(tm), which leads to more 'implied testing'. > By "tonight" I am, of course, referring to my own frame of reference > which is EDT (UTC -400). I assume that should be UTC-4. Then we're '5 hours apart' - 05:00 for you is 10:00 for me - i.e. I was less than an hour 'quick' checking for the snapshot, assuming it was published at 5 in the morning. Being tired and generally impatient is my excuse for this - 'brain performance' is lowered considerably in the late hours ;-7 . /Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE - 59?16.37'N, 17?12.60'E --CET, GMT+1, UTC+1-- This was moved here, because it really is off topic: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:21:48PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >Ok. I guess I don't have any more time to devote to it either. Thanks > >for playing. > > Ok. I lied. Ha! ;-) I am impatient[1] too, so you I believe I have full recognition of the problem... I was very disappointed (just like a child ;-] - I know) when I couldn't find the 'famous' snapshot. [1] I'd day this is a sickness of our time. Waiting for more than a number of seconds has become something that is hard, for a number of people. Me included. ;-) I'm afraid of using faster computers than my own, because then I'll grow impatient on it - as I am currently stuck with it. But then, I have 'practice' of running relatively slow computers; An MC68060 based Amiga, I still use it, mostly for burning CD's of backups and digital image collections. (I have digital photo as one of my more time consuming hobbies.) --END OF MESSAGE-- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/