Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:15:24 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Find: missing alphabetically last -  more FAITH to tell about
Message-ID: <20030911151524.GA5796@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3F606556 DOT 70901 AT gmx DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F606556.70901@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Ralph Ulrich wrote:
>>>The tree of the alphabetically last directory will not be listed by
>>>find on my W2k sp3 Computer.
>
>>This should be fixed in tonight's snapshot.
>
>This such fundamental bug is astonishing: How many tools sitting upon
>correct work of find! ...  And no one has told about here for so long?

No one had the inclination to check it out, actually.  I was bored
yesterday, and I'd just been working in the particular part of the code
that was broken, so I looked into it.

>Over a year ago in "de.alt.comp.cygwin+co" i wanted to discuss this
>bug.  But no one respondet.

That's sort of how free software works.  Sometimes it's hit or miss.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/