Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-Filter: check_local AT alphatech DOT com 4.4(020923:1754) http://digitalanswers.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: package _version_ check References: Reply-To: sds AT gnu DOT org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Mail-Copies-To: never From: Sam Steingold In-Reply-To: Date: 09 Sep 2003 15:14:40 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Igor Pechtchanski [Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:02:25 -0400 (EDT)]: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Sam Steingold wrote: > > > how do I check that the installed package foo was built against cygwin > > 1.5 and not 1.3? > > I doubt there's a utility that'd tell you that. At a guess, if you > only want to distinguish between these two versions, you should be > able to call "strings" on an executable from the package and look at > the bottom for functions added in Cygwin 1.5, but that's only going to > tell you if the package is using new functionality or not. shouldn't setup.exe refuse to install 1.5.3 unless all packages that use 1.3 are also upgraded? like RPM and apt-get at al do?! -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/