Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3F5D673D.1020006@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 01:38:05 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] NEW: mingw-zlib-1.1.4-4 References: <20030907084832 DOT E3F556C749 AT redhat DOT com> <20030908142331 DOT GB5065 AT redhat DOT com> <20030908151538 DOT GD5065 AT redhat DOT com> <3F5D4669 DOT 8070805 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20030909053300 DOT GB25647 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20030909053300.GB25647@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Tsk, tsk. I didn't notice that you invented a new category. > > I don't see any reason why this should just be in Libs. It's a mingw > library but, since we don't make the Mingw distinction for anything > else, I don't know why zlib should be different. The description > should be adequate, IMO. Done. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/