Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 00:28:05 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive
Message-ID: <20030907042805.GA22596@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030905124047 DOT GD1852 AT tishler DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0309051113580 DOT 26266 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20030905190127 DOT GB4483 AT redhat DOT com> <20030906004249 DOT GO1852 AT tishler DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030906004249.GO1852@tishler.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:42:49PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:01:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If the only concern is that cygcheck takes a long time, now, then,
>> like I said, that is something that can be rectified.
>
>Yes, the above is my real concern.

I just hacked cygcheck to avoid calling gzip and use a mingw libz.a
(courtesy of Chuck Wilson) and it takes 26 seconds to complete on my
dual PIII 733MHZ WinXP system.  I have most packages installed.

Is that still too slow?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/