Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20030906234314.88136.qmail@web14401.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerry Reno Subject: Re: gcc 3.2 and symbolic links problem To: Max Bowsher , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <002b01c374cf$6af8fa20$a9308751@starfruit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have compiled these programs before with the symlinks. Yes it was with cygwin and not mingw. I just changed my PATH and its compiling. thx, Gerry Reno --- Max Bowsher wrote: > Gerry Reno wrote: > > The error looks like: > > > > $ ls -l myfile.c > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 greno None 110 Sep 6 19:06 myfile.c -> > > ../myfile.c > > > > gcc -c myfile.c -o myfile.o > > gcc.exe: myfile.c: No such file or directory > > gcc.exe: no input files > > > > $gcc --version > > gcc.exe (GCC) 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1) > > *MINGW*. It shouldn't surprise you that a native Windows program is > unable > to understand Cygwin symlinks. > > > --- Gerry Reno wrote: > >> I recently upgraded to cygwin 1.5.3 and to Mingw 3.0.0 and I now > >> notice that gcc will fail when trying to compile files that are > >> symlinks. I tried deleting and recreating the link - still fails. > I > >> can read all the files and use all other tools with these > symlinks. > >> Has anyone else seen this problem with gcc 3.2? > > No, because you are *not* using gcc 3.2. > > Max. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/