Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dylan Cuthbert" Subject: Re: Rsync / incorrect uids Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:41:52 +0900 Lines: 64 Message-ID: References: <3F5702D9 DOT 1060004 AT lapo DOT it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 No, the samba share part of mail was describing that I am using samba to be my Primary Domain Controller, because I thought that might have some effect on user ids. rsync access is via a rsync daemon running on the linux machine. I forgot to mention but Cygwin is setup as "ntsec tty" I know cygwin "plays" with the win2k user ids and group names to get them to look like linux users and paths so I thought maybe this was the problem. The rsync documentation says it matches users and group names by their names rather than use the ids directly, but it does have a mention of the case when the *source* is an rsync server so maybe this feature just doesn't work very well when using an rsync server as opposed to ssh for rsync's transport. Regards --------------------------------- Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert. http://www.q-games.com "Lapo Luchini" wrote in message news:3F5702D9 DOT 1060004 AT lapo DOT it... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dylan Cuthbert wrote: > > |id dylan gives me the uid 12000, but that's just the NT Domain login > user id > |that's been mapped by cygwin. The uid for the username "dylan" on the > linux > |box is 500. > > This doesn't seems cygwin-related.. if rsync decided to "map" uid basing > on the similarity of the name (which can be a good or a bad thing, I can > think of both examples) or not it's more of a rsync-related feature. > So I'd suggest to use rsync AT lists DOT samba DOT org > > BTW: why the samba share? are you using rsync *or* samba to transfer the > file? or rsync over samba? > > Lapo > > - -- > Lapo 'Raist' Luchini > lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) > http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAj9XAtcACgkQaJiCLMjyUvuWqQCgqaPbH2JleSUSNCELvv3zbika > IT4AoINCYI/ArWl4nzlgDFeSFAvBjUDq > =0QtW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/