Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Sensitivity: Subject: WOOO HOOO!!!! 1.5.3 Fixes This!!! Re: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:26:33 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 134A69F11290839-01-03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit *Kisses and flower petals* ;-) for cgf, Corrina, Igor, Elfyn, and all the rest who helped make this happen!!! Brian Kelly Brian Kelly 08/20/2003 08:56 AM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com cc: Subject: Re: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd (Document link: Brian Kelly) Thanks Elfyn - you did a great job fixing the *silence* problem ;-) Yea - I guess if I want it, I got to do some work to get it. I'll try running those traces later today if I get some time. In the meantime if anyone else can run a quick test, you'd be "helping the cause" - something to feel *good* about. ;-) Brian Kelly "Elfyn McBratney" @cygwin.com on 08/20/2003 08:50:43 AM Please respond to cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Sent by: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire) Subject: Re: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd Elfyn McBratney wrote: > Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com wrote: > > > > "The silence is deafening". Apparently there aren't too many folks using > > telnet with > > xinetd ( I know, I know, SSH is what everyone's doing ). Anyhow, I do have > > a fairly important > > need for this combo, and the problem outlined below is a significant one > > for me. Before I > > do anything else - I would *really* like to know at least, if anyone else > > gets the same behavior. > > That would at least establish that I'm dealing with a legitimate bug rather > > than a setup > > or configuration issue. Just a "me too" - or "works for me" would be MUCH > > appreciated. > > You could try attaching to the xinetd (and inetd) process with strace to see > if there's a noticable difference somewhere. Hmmm... What I meant to say is attach *to* the telnetd processes not the *inetd processes. -- Elfyn -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ "WellChoice, Inc." made the following annotations on 09/02/2003 11:25:49 AM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attention! This electronic message contains information that may be legally confidential and/or privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Release/Disclosure Statement -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/