Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:23:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ftp crash with latest inetutils and cygwin 1.5 Message-ID: <20030831032329.GA23897@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030830173651 DOT 0081a5f0 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <20030830235044 DOT GA21853 AT redhat DOT com> <20030831023628 DOT GA22943 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:57:47PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:22:28PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: >>>I was able to reproduce using the latest snapshot on Win2000 SP4. >>That's odd. I thought you couldn't run any programs at all. >> >It's nice that some of us can remain so objective and professional. You >really make my minimal yet positive contributions feel worthwhile. I'm sorry. I got you confused with Ronald Landheer-Cieslak: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-08/msg01443.html It wasn't intended as an insult, in any event. It was a genuine expression of puzzlement. Now I'm no longer puzzled about that aspect of the problem at least. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/