Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:41:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Rob Clack cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: perl test fails] In-Reply-To: <3F4F371A.1070905@sanger.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <3F4F1D8B DOT 9070505 AT sanger DOT ac DOT uk> <20030829095256 DOT GE614 AT emcb DOT co DOT uk> <3F4F2BFD DOT 2060408 AT sanger DOT ac DOT uk> <20030829105211 DOT GL614 AT emcb DOT co DOT uk> <3F4F371A DOT 1070905 AT sanger DOT ac DOT uk> Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Rob, Actually, this behavior also depends on the filesystem you use. CYGWIN=ntsec alone only helps if you have NTFS. For FAT you also need "ntea" (i.e., CYGWIN="ntsec ntea" -- be aware that it'll create a large file in your drive's root directory). I believe permissions on FAT32 were broken somehow, but don't recall the details -- just search the archives for "FAT32 ntea". Igor On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Rob Clack wrote: > Thank you Elfyn and Jurgen. A few moment's thought would have reminded > me that file permissions are handled differently on NT. ;) > > Regards > Rob > > Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > Rob Clack wrote: > > > >>[...] > >>So there seems to be a couple of weensy buggettes there, though I'm not > >>suggesting anyone bother to fix them unless they happen to be working > >>there anyway. They're not serious bugs, but they did obscure the real > >>problem and waste quite a lot of my and several other people's time. > >> > >>1. chmod should surely change the permissions whatever the contents of > >>the file, and if it doesn't, it should issue a message. Silent failure > >>is not very friendly. > > > > > > If your on an NT variant all you have to do is set CYGWIN=ntsec (If you want > > support for NT extended attributes you can add `ntea', too). However, on > > win9x the `ch*' family of calls retrun success (IIRC), as the underlying OS > > does not support security in the way NT does. I might be slightly wrong about > > the win9x but, though it's documented in either the User's Guide of the FAQ. > > > > You can then use `ch{mod,own,grp}' in the same way you would on Linux. > > > > -- Elfyn -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/