Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:52:56 +0100 From: Elfyn McBratney To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: perl test fails] Message-ID: <20030829095256.GE614@emcb.co.uk> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3F4F1D8B DOT 9070505 AT sanger DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F4F1D8B.9070505@sanger.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Rob Clack wrote: > Well I thought maybe I'd better just try setting $CYGWIN, even though it > didn't seem relevant (I don't have "..problems with NT shares or Samba > drives..", since the script reliably breaks when run from a local, > non-shared drive) and indeed, it made no difference. Unless there's > some special way I should be setting it. I just entered > CYGWIN=nosmbntsec at the dollar prompt. > > OK, so if I assume by the silence that -x is broken, can anyone suggest > how I can determine in a perl script whether or not a file is executable? The `-x' operator WFM. Does, say, this script fail for you (make sure perl is *actually* executable) ? #!/usr/bin/perl if (-x "/usr/bin/perl") { print "yupp, perl is executable.\n"; } else { print "ut-oh! perl isn't executable.\n"; } If you haven't already posted cygcheck[1] output, that might help, and also post your script (I couldn't find it in my archives). Sorry if you've already done this. -- Elfyn [1] non-inline, plain-text attachment, as per > ------------- hyphens to separate this from previous posts ------------- > > Thank you Igor. However, I've now read the entry on smbntsec and it > doesn't seem relevant. (Was a useful exercise in itself, since I didn't > know about the CYGWIN env var either ;)) I don't have a problem on the > Linux box, only on the NT one. And it doesn't matter whether I'm running > the script from the networked drive or from the local hard drive, I only > get the error under Cygwin. > > So far it keeps looking to me as though Cygwin is broken. > > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Rob Clack wrote: > > > >>Hmmm, don't see how it can have anything to do with the mapping of a > >>networked drive, since the problem started on the NT4 box, at which time > >>the scriptlet was located in /cygdrive/e/cygwin/rnc/try. > >> > >>Since I wanted to demonstrate that it worked on the Linux box (having > >>tripped over that one originally!) each time I hacked one copy of the > >>script I then had to move to the other machine and duplicate the changes > >>I'd just made. Clearly this was error-prone, so it made sense to just > >>use the copy on the Linux box. On the NT4 it's accessible as > >>/cygdrive/i/rnc/try. > > > >Rob, > > > >Well, it's usually a good idea to keep as many variables fixed as > >possible. By sharing the script, you've unknowingly introduced another > >variable (that of SMB shares). I'd suggest moving the script back to a > >local directory, and simply copying it to the shared drive when you want > >to try it on Linux. That way you can reliably reproduce the problem on > >the local drive. > > > >>And no, I've never heard of smbntsec. What's it mean/do? > > > >See . It's on by > >default. FYI, it may require very careful hand-maintenance of /etc/passwd > >and /etc/group (in fact, I've ended up turning it off because the > >maintenance effort wasn't worth it for me). You might wish to add > >"nosmbntsec" to your CYGWIN variable. > > Igor > >> > >>>At 09:36 AM 8/26/2003, Rob Clack you wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Gerrit > >>>> > >>>>I've been away for a week, hence the delayed response. > >>>> > >>>>Thanks for this and clearly my scriptlet was broken. I've now tried > >>>>both alternatives as suggested below. Both work perfectly under Linux. > >>>>Neither works under NT4. > >>>> > >>>>Linux output: > >>>> > >>>>script is executable > >>>> > >>>>NT4 output: > >>>> > >>>>I damn well am! > >>>> > >>>>To eliminate error further, I'm now running just one copy of the > >>>>script, since the disk I use on my Linux box is mapped to the i: drive > >>>>on the NT4 box. > >>> > >>>Are you suggesting that you're using a mapped drive from your Linux box? > >>>That may be the problem. Do you have 'smbntsec' set in your CYGWIN > >>>environment variable? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/