Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Rolf Campbell Subject: Re: ash 20020731-3 and/or cygwin 1.5.2 directory vs. executable problem Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:40:49 -0400 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <20030811180612 DOT GB1136 AT tishler DOT net> <20030811190539 DOT GO3101 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20030811200134 DOT GA1392 AT tishler DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030811200134.GA1392@tishler.net> Jason Tishler wrote: > Corinna, > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:05:39PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >> >>>Since the source of ash 20020731-1 seems identical to ash >>>20020731-3, this seems to indicate a build and/or cygwin problem... >>It's a situation which is determined by coincidence... > Huh? I think it has to do with which dir-entry appears first. Or something like that. It has been mentioned before that this is a known limitation of cygwin. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/