Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:13:02 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak Message-ID: <20030808151302.GA6722@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:01:14AM -0400, Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com wrote: >Seems to little ole *clueless* me, such such issues could be addressed >in that project. Seems like it'd be a heck of lot more congenial and >productive to engage in creative "what if" scenario's about future >developmemt possibilities than knee jerk character attacks. (Of course >I realize that's more of a cygwin-app discussion - but it would >certainly work well to placate us clueless types in the meantime.) This is by no means a cygwin-app discussion. Read http://cygwin.com/lists.html . >I've made no demands, asked for no status, and set no deadlines. Just still >*dumbfounded* at the "go tell it on the Microsoft" posturing. Hopefully you are not referring to me. I suggested that interested parties could do a Knowledge Base or google search. I guess you don't qualify. For the record, I called a comment of yours clueless. I did not label you personally. You seem to be having fun doing that to yourself, though, so I'm glad I offered you some enjoyment. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/